But be aware that - > Take a look at this:http://www.healthypetmobilevet.com/area.shtml
That doesn't use Directions to calculate travel charges, it does point- in-polygon analysis of developer supplied areas. i.e. it doesn't use any Google content as a basis to calculate charges. Might well be an alternative approach for fuss. > You can certainly estimate taxi > costs specific to some route for users. For example, > see:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/interactives/taxifares/http://www.taxifarefinder.com/main.php?city=DC Yup, both those provide a public facing free service, and estimate a charge based on Google content. In neither case do the providers use free Google content in their _internal_ business processes e.g. billing, which seems to me to be what the terms are driving at. I would say fuss' 1st case, which specifys billing, falls foul of 10.9(c) " ... similar enterprise applications ..." I'm NOT a lawyer and not convinced it is forbidden, but I think there is enough fuel there to fire doubts. Advice is as before, consult a real lawyer. Some other consideration here - http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api/browse_thread/thread/99a1dadaf07f8faa -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.
