I understand. We can look into the CSS solution for this situation.
Is there a work around using a Premiere API license or some other paid version ? On May 7, 11:35 am, Andrew Leach <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 7, 4:10 pm, Techgrowth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Does this violate the terms of use ? The terms say is has to be on a > > website, the PDF is part of their website so does that count ? > > > Any input would be appreciated. > > Read 10.8 again. It doesn't say "on a website", it says > "implementation in a web browser". > > Yes, PDFs do violate the Terms, because a PDF cannot be viewed in a > browser: the browser needs a helper application which is not actually > part of the browser. Static Maps must be called via an HTML <img> > element. This is made explicit in the documentation: "You embed a > Static Maps API image within a webpage inside an <img> tag's src > attribute. When the webpage is displayed, the browser requests the > image from the the Static Maps API and it renders within the image > location. Note that static maps may only be displayed within browser > content; use of static maps outside of the browser is not allowed." > > Having said that, there is no restriction on using CSS to provide a > correctly-formatted print version of a web page and allowing the user > to print their own copy. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Maps API" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.
