On Sep 6, 2:27 pm, Barry Hunter <[email protected]> wrote: > Depends what you want to do. > > RSS is compatible with a wide range of feed-readers. So if want your > content loadable there, thats a consideration. But not all GIS systems > can read RSS (and you have to content with many variations of RSS > (including GeoRSS) > > But KML offers a fuller Geographical specification (styles, colours > etc), but is generally only loadable in GIS type systems. > > On 6 September 2010 14:47, Niklasro(.appspot) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Which format can you recommend: KML or GeoRSS? What are the advantages > > and disadvantages compared? > > Thanks > > Niklas R > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Maps API" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en. Thank you for helping with specifics. I found KML could handle escape chars i infowindows and georss couldn't. I've tried to generate both types: forum.koolbusiness.com/output.kml and /georss The http://www.koolbusiness.com/georss looks valid but breaks infowindows when loaded to a map. Cheers Niklas
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API V2" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.
