On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:44 AM, bratliff <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 1:55 am, Ben Appleton <[email protected]> wrote:
>> That's right - forwarding the event is fine, but it can be slow to provide
>> listeners with an event Object including a Point and LatLng.  We considered
>> reusing Objects between calls, but that prevents the listener from storing
>> the Point/LatLng.
>
> I do not suppose you might be willing to pass two separate Lat & Lng
> variables (by value) rather than one LatLng object (by name).  It
> might be inconsistent but it would be quick - no garbage collection
> required - users could build their own LatLng objects if required.
> Perhaps you could have separate "slowmousemove" / "fastmousemove"
> event listeners.  One for API purists.  One for speed freaks.

Agreed it's a possible solution. We'll see how the standard event pans
out first.

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.

Reply via email to