If I remember correctly, v2 ggroundoverlay used some sort of transformation to flatten the image at pixel level depending on latitude. V3 probably doing same thing. If you can use groundoverlay, you should use it.
On Oct 5, 2:26 pm, Josh <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's the problem I'm facing: Basically, there are two images on this > map, one at 100% opacity, and one at 40% opacity. They should both > line up and overlap each other, but as you can see, they don't. I'm > using both a.) the GroundOverlay class (100%), and b.) a custom-built > OverlayView class (40%) to display these. Currently, the GroundOverlay > (the one at 100% opacity) is the correct method of displaying the > radar. However, either the projection of the RadarOverlay custom class > is wrong, or the math is wrong. Any ideas? > > I used this official tutorial to build the custom class: > > http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/overlays.ht... > > Here is the example of the problem: > > http://j.mp/97FvTS > > Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
