Thanks for the tip... I've resubmitted it. For future reference, do all tags need to exist, and be populated with values, or just if a tag does exist, it must contain a value?
ie; could I have just removed the tag completely? On Sep 18, 9:00 pm, caffleine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I apologize for the delayed response -- I have been out of town for a > few weeks. > > In terms of Dan's theme XML, it seems to have a bug and is probably > the reason it has not been approved; Dan, please fill out all theme > attributes (footer.tile_image.url, footer.center_image.url). Let me > know if you run into any further problems submitting or would like to > check on the status. > > If a theme has not shown up within 2 weeks of submission, it's either > because the theme was not properly submitted/received or that the > theme had been denied during the approvals process. I understand this > can be really frustrating without any status confirmation, and we are > working on ways to improve. For now, if you are concerned about your > theme, please don't hesitate to contact the group owner. > > Thanks for your patience, > > Kathleen > > On Sep 16, 8:11 am, Elite Designs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ditto to both of you Mike and Willem. It is so much bull and its > > really gotten to the point of absolute irritation! Google acts like > > your an inconsquential person and don't deserve any kind of reply to > > your concerns. Far as I see it, they definitely should lose some of > > the good theme designers for lack of interest. You 100% correct about > > some of the trashy themes that are accepted, it really surprises me > > too! I keep mulling it around to call it quits completely and it may > > just happen cause I will be needing to renew my webhosting and see no > > point in wasting my money or time. Definitely strong considerations > > on my part..... Gee, even Kathleen hasn't respond. I posted numerous > > times asking why is there a hold up AGAIN. > > > On Sep 16, 7:52 am, Mike Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I get the impression that they must be reworking a bunch of their > > > gadgets to take advantage of the new format. It would be nice though > > > if someone from google would occasionally say WHY they are not > > > approving themes at this time. Hopefully they will get rid of some of > > > the atrocious junk that's in the gallery now while they are at it. > > > > On Sep 16, 5:50 am, Willem Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > 3 weeks only... My theme still does not show after almost 3 MONTHS... > > > > It's freaking stupid and I don't know what they're busy with. It's not > > > > thát hard to just inform people on submission status or what? > > > > > On Sep 16, 4:51 am, Elite Designs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Really sucks doesn't it? > > > > > > On Sep 15, 12:26 pm, danshultz11 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >http://hosting.gmodules.com/ig/gadgets/file/104871615741014484820/dan... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Themes API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-themes-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
