Yeah. But ... finding a Latin native speaker will certainly be not easy :-))
On Jun 21, 4:08 am, Ronweasley <[email protected]> wrote: > I love Google translate. It is exceedingly useful and has helped me a > lot, since I am doing a study of Europe and have thus far been forced > to translate passages from 11 European languages. As I say, it is a > wonderful tool and I applaud whomever created it. > > However, I notice that certain languages work better than others. When > translated into English, Spanish, French, German, and Portuguese work > fairly well. But Latin, Finnish, Norwegian, Estonian, and a few others > provide rather poor translations-sometimes it is impossible to tell > what is being translated. > > Many words seem to be missing from these languages (particularly older > or less-commonly used words) and the syntax of the translation is > often incomprehensible. Since I am translating from a good many books > published prior to 1900, this makes my task rather difficult. If I > were to make a suggestion, I would try finding a person both fluent > and well-read in both a language (Lithuanian, Latin, Norwegian, etc) > and English (or any other language needing translation) to look over > your program and fix the problems. A native speaker would naturally be > able to spot syntax errors and would be more likely to know words > missing from a standard Finnish to English or Latin to English > dictionary. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "General" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-translate-general?hl=en.
