missed it originally, and replied now.

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:16 PM, VizGuy <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Sorry for the late reply, kind of missed this one.
> So in general, IE is not the fastest browser around, especially not IE6.
> There is no clear thing that we are aware of in order to improve this
> issue, except of constant effort to improve latency of this (and all) chart.
>
> Regards,
> VizGuy
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Bob <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I've noticed that when using the AnnotatedTImeLine (ATL) in Internet
>> Explorer (IE) 6 and 7, that the Flash widget has more problems
>> releasing memory than when run in Firefox 3.0.8 on the same Windows
>> box. To be fair, I'm updating the data in the graph every 10 sec, and
>> it gets to be between 300 and 1000 rows in the DataTable per update.
>>
>> Yeah, it's a lot of data.
>>
>> But in Firefox 3.0.8 the Flash Player 10 (latest release) works fine
>> for hours and hours. But hit the same page in IE 6 or 7 and it'll die
>> in about an hour and a half (roughly). I can plot the memory usage,
>> and in the case of IE, it's constantly rising, while in Firefox it's
>> stable.
>>
>> Same box - Windows XP.
>>
>> So my question is this: is this a known issue with the ATL, and is it
>> being worked on? Or is this a problem with the Flash Player and IE,
>> and there's nothing to be done in the ATL's code itself?
>>
>> I'm just trying to see if I have any hope of allowing IE 6 or 7 to my
>> users, or if I have to tell them it's a ticking time bomb, and use
>> Firefox.
>>
>> Thanks so much for the great tools, they have been a joy to work with.
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Visualization API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to