In this example there is indeed a but, but I think its not the same one.Here you can see that in general the two charts are the same, except for the two zero value that look like max values instead.
In the first example you sent there is a bigger diff between the charts. We will look at this problem, but if you can still send data to recreate the first problem, it will help. Thanks, VizGuy On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Albert <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello and thanks for the reply. Here is the Json object I use to build the > datatable object that feeds the graph. > {cols:[{label:'date',type:'date'},{label:'',type:'number'}],rows: > [{c:[{v:new Date(2007,02,01)},{v:0.3}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2007,02,28)},{v:0.3}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2007,03,30)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2007,05,01)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2007,05,29)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2007,06,30)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2007,07,31)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2007,08,28)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2007,10,01)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2007,10,30)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2007,11,21)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2007,12,31)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2008,01,29)},{v:0.3}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2008,02,28)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2008,04,01)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2008,04,30)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2008,05,27)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2008,07,04)},{v:0.3}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2008,07,29)},{v:0.3}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2008,08,29)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2008,09,30)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new Date(2008,10,26)},{v:0}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2008,11,24)},{v:0}]},{c:[{v:new Date(2009,01,02)},{v:0}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2009,02,02)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2009,02,27)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2009,03,30)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2009,05,01)},{v:0.3}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2009,05,26)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new > Date(2009,07,04)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new Date(2009,07,28)},{v:0.1}]}]} > > here is the js function I use to draw the graf > > function drawIt(datatable, div) { eval("var jsonObject =" + datatable); var > data = new google.visualization.DataTable(jsonObject); var chart = new > google.visualization.AnnotatedTimeLine(document.getElementById(div)); > $('loaderImg').remove(); chart.draw(data, { 'displayAnnotations': false, > 'displayAnnotationsFilter':false, 'allowHtml':true, 'fill': 20, 'thickness': > 2 }); } > > the result is the attached image. > > > thanks. > > You can browse more examples on our site > http://www.fxstreet.com/fundamental/economic-calendar/ after cliking one > of the displayed events and inside the history tab. > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:29 PM, VizGuy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> While this looks like a bug, I have never seen other cases like this. >> The line at the range selection are is a logarithmic manipulation of the >> last (in this case - only) data line. >> >> Could you provide some real data that creates this problem so we can track >> it down? >> >> >> Thanks, >> VizGuy >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Albert <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> any tips on that? is that a bug or a malfunction? >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Albert <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi. I have found some inconsistense betwen the main graph of the >>>> annotation time line and the graph displayed in the range selection area. >>>> You can see in the picture the "unlogic" diferences. Is that a known >>>> bug. I'm doing something wrong? >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Visualization API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
