here you have the data for the first example.
{cols:[{label:'date',type:'date'},{label:'',type:'number'}],rows:
[{c:[{v:new Date(2007,08,27)},{v:0.9}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2007,09,24)},{v:0.9}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2007,10,21)},{v:0.8}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2007,11,21)},{v:0.6}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2007,12,23)},{v:0.6}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2008,02,29)},{v:0.6}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2008,03,25)},{v:0.3}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2008,04,23)},{v:0.5}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2008,05,30)},{v:0.3}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2008,06,25)},{v:0.4}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2008,07,29)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2008,09,01)},{v:-0.1}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2008,09,24)},{v:-0.3}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2008,10,26)},{v:-0.5}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2008,11,23)},{v:-0.3}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2008,12,23)},{v:-0.5}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2009,01,25)},{v:-0.8}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2009,02,28)},{v:-1.3}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2009,03,24)},{v:-1.3}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2009,04,22)},{v:-1.2}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2009,06,01)},{v:-1.2}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2009,06,24)},{v:-1}]},{c:[{v:new
Date(2009,07,28)},{v:-0.6}]},{c:[{v:new Date(2009,08,30)},{v:-0.2}]}]}On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:32 AM, VizGuy <[email protected]> wrote: > In this example there is indeed a but, but I think its not the same one.Here > you can see that in general the two charts are the same, except for the two > zero value that look like max values instead. > > In the first example you sent there is a bigger diff between the charts. > > We will look at this problem, but if you can still send data to recreate > the first problem, it will help. > > > Thanks, > VizGuy > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Albert <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello and thanks for the reply. Here is the Json object I use to build the >> datatable object that feeds the graph. >> {cols:[{label:'date',type:'date'},{label:'',type:'number'}],rows: >> [{c:[{v:new Date(2007,02,01)},{v:0.3}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2007,02,28)},{v:0.3}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2007,03,30)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2007,05,01)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2007,05,29)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2007,06,30)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2007,07,31)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2007,08,28)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2007,10,01)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2007,10,30)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2007,11,21)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2007,12,31)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2008,01,29)},{v:0.3}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2008,02,28)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2008,04,01)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2008,04,30)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2008,05,27)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2008,07,04)},{v:0.3}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2008,07,29)},{v:0.3}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2008,08,29)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2008,09,30)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new Date(2008,10,26)},{v:0}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2008,11,24)},{v:0}]},{c:[{v:new Date(2009,01,02)},{v:0}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2009,02,02)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2009,02,27)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2009,03,30)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2009,05,01)},{v:0.3}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2009,05,26)},{v:0.1}]},{c:[{v:new >> Date(2009,07,04)},{v:0.2}]},{c:[{v:new Date(2009,07,28)},{v:0.1}]}]} >> >> here is the js function I use to draw the graf >> >> function drawIt(datatable, div) { eval("var jsonObject =" + datatable); >> var data = new google.visualization.DataTable(jsonObject); var chart = new >> google.visualization.AnnotatedTimeLine(document.getElementById(div)); >> $('loaderImg').remove(); chart.draw(data, { 'displayAnnotations': false, >> 'displayAnnotationsFilter':false, 'allowHtml':true, 'fill': 20, 'thickness': >> 2 }); } >> >> the result is the attached image. >> >> >> thanks. >> >> You can browse more examples on our site >> http://www.fxstreet.com/fundamental/economic-calendar/ after cliking one >> of the displayed events and inside the history tab. >> >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:29 PM, VizGuy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> While this looks like a bug, I have never seen other cases like this. >>> The line at the range selection are is a logarithmic manipulation of the >>> last (in this case - only) data line. >>> >>> Could you provide some real data that creates this problem so we can >>> track it down? >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> VizGuy >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Albert <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> any tips on that? is that a bug or a malfunction? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Albert <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi. I have found some inconsistense betwen the main graph of the >>>>> annotation time line and the graph displayed in the range selection area. >>>>> You can see in the picture the "unlogic" diferences. Is that a known >>>>> bug. I'm doing something wrong? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Visualization API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
