giving GWT Visualization and Google Visualizations such a restrictive use terms is the "dumbest" ever to come from Google, what were the reasons for this by the way, I don't see the point at all. I support an offline option.
On Mar 11, 3:49 pm, Paulo Marquez <[email protected]> wrote: > I second the motion!, it's simply logical. > > Regards > > Paulo Márquez > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Nico R. <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > @Google Vis Team, but also for comments and supports @All > > Now seriously! How do you want to establish GWT in Enterprise > > Development if you put a very interesting part under such senseless > > use terms like the ones from GWT Visualization? > > I just spend 3 days of work on a enterprise wide intranet application > > to integrate Visualization Charts, just to realize in the end that GWT > > Vis is not usable without an internet connection. > > Unfortunately not every company has such free internet using policies > > as I imagine them in your company, so the Vis Package is totally > > useless for Intranet applications. > > Make GWT Visualization offline available! (Please) > > > regards > > Nico R. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Visualization API" group. > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<google-visualization-api%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Visualization API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api?hl=en.
