Yea I know.. I have read the protocol many times over... and all the docs I could find. I wanna implement a server but whats the used? I have to take on getting a Ruby library together to implement a client. thats what Im working on now.. but in the mean time.. Id just like to play a lil inside.. damn it. :)
On Oct 1, 3:51 pm, Andrey Fedorov <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know anything about the the technical glitches with invites, but > there is more than enough open information on > > http://waveprotocol.org/ > > and code at > > http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/ > > To keep one busy for two months. > > Cheers, > Andrey > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Tony Hoyle <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 1 Oct, 13:55, David Trattnig <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Augurae, I think it's not so easy to balance such a complex product right > > > from the beginning. Imagine millions of users interacting on a "product > > in > > > construction" at the same time. Operational Transform is not just your > > > common RDBMS app. First you have to figure out where the borders are and > > you > > > can incrementally improve... > > > It *is* frustrating to have project ideas ready, sign up early (on the > > first day, in fact), be invited... then have the google registration > > system screw up so your invite doesn't work. > > Then be passed over for the next 100,000 invites. > > > I appreciate they have to scale it, but why the whole "Your in!" "No > > you're not" dance?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
