This is an addition.  There is a note about Java arrays being opaque objects
above in the main part of the doc - do you think that's sufficient?

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Scott Blum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Eric, was this an addition, or was there text there before?  I think we
> should be clear that passing a Java array into JavaScript is not supported,
> then we can turn around and suggest the JsArray* classes as an alternative.
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Eric Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> John,
>>
>> Would you please review the following change I made to the Developer's
>> Guide?
>>
>> Updated the page:
>>
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-doc-1-5/wiki/DevGuideMarshaling?updated=DevGuideMarshaling&ts=1220969310
>>
>> with the following text near the bottom:
>>
>> "When passing arrays between JavaScript and Java, the helper classes
>> JsArray, JsArrayBoolean, JsArrayInteger, JsArrayNumber, and JsArrayString
>> can be used to efficiently pass arrays when compiled into JavaScript. When
>> compiled, these classes turn into native JavaScript arrays."
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Eric.
>> --
>> Eric Z. Ayers - GWT Team - Atlanta, GA USA
>> http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/
>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>


-- 
Eric Z. Ayers - GWT Team - Atlanta, GA USA
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to