Edits welcome!

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Scott Blum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Probably.  Maybe I'm just thinking a slight word tweak would make it
> clearer, like:
> "Although Java arrays cannot be used directly in JavaScript, the helper
> classes...."
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Eric Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This is an addition.  There is a note about Java arrays being opaque
>> objects above in the main part of the doc - do you think that's sufficient?
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Scott Blum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Eric, was this an addition, or was there text there before?  I think we
>>> should be clear that passing a Java array into JavaScript is not supported,
>>> then we can turn around and suggest the JsArray* classes as an alternative.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Eric Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> John,
>>>>
>>>> Would you please review the following change I made to the Developer's
>>>> Guide?
>>>>
>>>> Updated the page:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-doc-1-5/wiki/DevGuideMarshaling?updated=DevGuideMarshaling&ts=1220969310
>>>>
>>>> with the following text near the bottom:
>>>>
>>>> "When passing arrays between JavaScript and Java, the helper classes
>>>> JsArray, JsArrayBoolean, JsArrayInteger, JsArrayNumber, and JsArrayString
>>>> can be used to efficiently pass arrays when compiled into JavaScript. When
>>>> compiled, these classes turn into native JavaScript arrays."
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Eric.
>>>> --
>>>> Eric Z. Ayers - GWT Team - Atlanta, GA USA
>>>> http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Eric Z. Ayers - GWT Team - Atlanta, GA USA
>> http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/
>>
>
>


-- 
Eric Z. Ayers - GWT Team - Atlanta, GA USA
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to