Newer release : 
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=343#c28

On Sep 17, 9:07 pm, "chris.ruffalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Released here 
> :http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=343
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> On Sep 17, 6:42 pm, "chris.ruffalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I wasn't including the source files.  Disregard.  Release should be
> > soon.
>
> > On Sep 17, 3:38 pm, "chris.ruffalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > One final bit of help.
>
> > > I'm having problems building a jar that will work with the modules to
> > > compile under a normal project.  If I export the jar with Eclipse
> > > everything works fine ("add directory entries" and all that) and the
> > > compile and shell modes work.
>
> > > If I use an ant task to build the jar then it will not work with the
> > > compiled mode or the shell mode.
>
> > > I've never been able to have ant (1.7.1) do this in the past either,
> > > on other projects.
>
> > > Any help would be appreciated.
>
> > > On Sep 12, 11:08 pm, "chris.ruffalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I see.  That worked, I guess I was expecting something bad to happen
> > > > if I didn't write new source.  In retrospect why would that happen?
>
> > > > Fortunately I don't have to do anything different (per user agent)
> > > > yet.
>
> > > > On Sep 12, 3:39 pm, BobV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Namely:
> > > > > >  Hosted mode works fine but compiling tries to rebind twice (even
> > > > > > though I only have
> > > > > > one GWT.create()) and it can't create the printwriter because the
> > > > > > class it is trying to write
> > > > > > already exists.  I guess I need a smarter generator. (?)
>
> > > > > This is expected behavior.  The generator gets called once per
> > > > > permutation.  If the PrintWriter is null, just return the name of the
> > > > > implementation class that you were tryping to create.  It works this
> > > > > way because you may want to generate different code for different
> > > > > user.agent values or along some other deferred-binding axis.  In this
> > > > > case, you would name the implementation classes differently.
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Bob Vawter
> > > > > Google Web Toolkit Team
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to