In the above Example the Parent field should also have an @Valid annotation.
Also, instead of updating in the GWT issue 343 thread I'm updating here: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-validation/ It also has the Java5 release for download. On Oct 8, 12:51 pm, "chris.ruffalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes it is, consider: > > public class Parent { > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > private String parentString = null; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > private Child child = null; > > /* > GETTER AND SETTER METHODS GO HERE > */ > > } > > public class Child { > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > private String childString = null; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > private Parent = null; > > /* > GETTER AND SETTER METHODS GO HERE > */ > > } > > (Not that this example would require proper getter methods and some > set values) > > In this case the @Valid annotation causes the validator to Validate > the child class according to the rules of that child class. The > @NotNull validation is performed first howerver /and/ it should be > noted that the @Valid annotation will not be processed on null objects > in any case. The validators also contain logic to prevent cyclic > reprocessing, for example if you set the bidirectional Parent<->Child > relationship as is possible in the example Parent /will not/ be > processed twice and therefore neither will Child. The protection > isn't perfect but it should be enough for the needs of most people. > > Let me know if you have any more questions. > > On Oct 8, 9:00 am, rb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is it possible to validate nested objects from a parent? > > > Thanks, > > Rex > > > On Oct 6, 8:23 pm, "chris.ruffalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yea, easily. I didn't mean to make it Java6 specific. > > > > isEmpty() seems like a better metaphor, I'll take a loot at it right > > > now. > > > > Thanks for pointing that out. > > > > On Oct 6, 9:13 am, rb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Could this be changed to support Java 5? > > > > > The String.isEmpty() and the AbstractValidator.unrollConstraintSet > > > > have Java 6 specific stuff. > > > > > A lot more people will be able to use this if you take out the Java 6 > > > > stuff. > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rex > > > > > On Oct 2, 1:22 pm, "chris.ruffalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Another release has been made > > > > > @http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=343 > > > > > > Please review and send me your comments. I'd like to target this for > > > > > the GWT Incubator so I can get some more eyes on and stuff. > > > > > > My CLA has been electronically submitted and I'm ready to go. > > > > > > Chris Ruffalo > > > > > > On Sep 12, 3:09 pm, "chris.ruffalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I've been looking at > > > > > > :http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=343 > > > > > > > And I've hit a few snags: > > > > > > > Namely: > > > > > > Hosted mode works fine but compiling tries to rebind twice (even > > > > > > though I only have > > > > > > one GWT.create()) and it can't create the printwriter because the > > > > > > class it is trying to write > > > > > > already exists. I guess I need a smarter generator. (?) > > > > > > > How the heck can I reconcile the functionality of java regex and > > > > > > compiled regex? I > > > > > > guess I could have a javascriptPattern and javaPattern property on > > > > > > each validator... but that > > > > > > sounds like a lot of work for the user. That is unless I've missed > > > > > > a > > > > > > new development along the > > > > > > lines of making that easier for developers. > > > > > > > Anyway, any input would be appreciated and I think if I can figure > > > > > > out > > > > > > these snags and get my > > > > > > CLA finished (I applied online last night) then I could post the > > > > > > code > > > > > > and people could start > > > > > > poking at it a little bit because basic field/method level > > > > > > validation > > > > > > is working. > > > > > > > Chris Ruffalo- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
