On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Arthur Kalmenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think requiring the HasData interface isn't a bad thing, but this > might frustrate developers in the short term as standard GWT widgets > don't implement the HasData interface.
I don't expect to require HasData, I just expect to have some kind of generic implementation for both Editor and Viewer that wrap a HasData instance so that, given a HasData instance, you don't have to do any work to integrate with the data binding library. > Overall it looks good. I like the new API idea. I think that settles it--I like it, too, and I guess your +1 makes me not insane. > P.S. Are you going to create a new Google Code project? It'd be easier > to track issues and contribute code. Thanks! Done. http://code.google.com/p/gwt-data-binding/ There's nothing there yet, but I'll look into fixing that ASAP. > P.P.S. Nice to have a fellow Torontonian here :) Indeed, but I'll be a Seattlite in three weeks for a new job. Given that, the next three weeks are going to be _very_ busy for me so I'm not sure how much progress I'll be able to make in any given direction. Ian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
