> Great, I've added a ticket already. The code would be helpful though > :P. We'd like to start sending in patches when we find some things to > change.
OK, the code is there now, but what do you use to build your projects usually? Do you use Maven or Ant? Personally, I prefer Maven.... -- Arthur Kalmenson On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Arthur Kalmenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I don't expect to require HasData, I just expect to have some kind of >> generic implementation for both Editor and Viewer that wrap a HasData >> instance so that, given a HasData instance, you don't have to do any >> work to integrate with the data binding library. > > Ah, thanks for clearing that up. > >> Done. http://code.google.com/p/gwt-data-binding/ There's nothing >> there yet, but I'll look into fixing that ASAP. > > Great, I've added a ticket already. The code would be helpful though > :P. We'd like to start sending in patches when we find some things to > change. > >> Indeed, but I'll be a Seattlite in three weeks for a new job. Given >> that, the next three weeks are going to be _very_ busy for me so I'm >> not sure how much progress I'll be able to make in any given >> direction. > > Oh, working for the enemy :P? Well good luck with your move, hope all goes > well. > > -- > Arthur Kalmenson > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Ian Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Arthur Kalmenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I think requiring the HasData interface isn't a bad thing, but this >>> might frustrate developers in the short term as standard GWT widgets >>> don't implement the HasData interface. >> >> I don't expect to require HasData, I just expect to have some kind of >> generic implementation for both Editor and Viewer that wrap a HasData >> instance so that, given a HasData instance, you don't have to do any >> work to integrate with the data binding library. >> >>> Overall it looks good. I like the new API idea. >> >> I think that settles it--I like it, too, and I guess your +1 makes me >> not insane. >> >>> P.S. Are you going to create a new Google Code project? It'd be easier >>> to track issues and contribute code. Thanks! >> >> Done. http://code.google.com/p/gwt-data-binding/ There's nothing >> there yet, but I'll look into fixing that ASAP. >> >>> P.P.S. Nice to have a fellow Torontonian here :) >> >> Indeed, but I'll be a Seattlite in three weeks for a new job. Given >> that, the next three weeks are going to be _very_ busy for me so I'm >> not sure how much progress I'll be able to make in any given >> direction. >> >> Ian >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
