On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Scott Blum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - We ended up going with Lex's ThreadPoolExecutor stuff. Mainly because he > was physically here, and I think both of the TPE-based implementations suck.
Well, we eliminated TPE itself. However, we went with message-passing coordination rather than checking multiple counters and queues and/or checking the interrupted states. -Lex --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
