Is that going to turn into a revolving door of new packages as each generation of widgets requires it's own namespace? It seems to me that the gen2 package idea was a mistake of convenience and maybe should have been a branch (or branches) that got merged back into trunk once it stabilized.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:57 AM, John LaBanca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is this a good idea? I think we should just deprecate the widgetideas > version now in favor of the gen2 version. I didn't attempt to copy > ScrollTable changes back to the widgetideas version, it would be a > nightmare. IMHO, development on widgetideas code should be closed once a > gen2 replacement is available. > > Thanks, > John LaBanca > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Code review request: >> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/source/detail?r=1250 >> >> Copying gen2-DropDownPanel over the widgetideas-DropDownPanel rather then >> patching the widgetideas version, as this way we only maintain one version >> of DropDownPanel, which is going to be depricated as soon as the first 1.6 >> milestone is released. >> >> >> -- >> "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand >> binary, and those who don't" > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
