Let's also be sure that the appropriate optimizers can statically resolve type checks on SingleJsoImpl interfaces.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:02 PM, BobV <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's the flag I asked about. In general it makes perfect sense to > > update the AST to hold any information that is needed. In this case, > > though, if I understand correctly, the information is soley determined > > by the target type of the cast. > > I put the flag in there so that JsoNormalizer would contain all of the > AST fix-up code relevant to the JSO type instead of splitting it > across visitors. I'm fine with getting rid of the flag entirely and > moving the flag-setting code from JsoNormalizer into CastNormalizer. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
