Isaac, I would put money on our updating to a newer version of JDT. I'd find where Lex committed this upgrade... if there are no code changes, you might try putting the newer JDT higher on the classpath as a test. If that works, simple jar surgery should get you where you want to go.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Isaac Truett <itru...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've found an interesting error in GWT 1.5.3: > > [ERROR] Line 14: Type mismatch: cannot convert from > Test.Parametric.Number > s to Test.Parametric<T>.Numbers > [ERROR] Line 17: Type mismatch: cannot convert from > Test.Parametric.Number > s to Test.Parametric<T>.Numbers > Compiling module test.Test > Computing all possible rebind results for 'test.client.Test' > Rebinding test.client.Test > Checking rule <generate-with > class='com.google.gwt.user.rebind.ui.ImageBun > dleGenerator'/> > [ERROR] Unable to find type 'test.client.Test' > [ERROR] Hint: Previous compiler errors may have made this type > unava > ilable > [ERROR] Hint: Check the inheritance chain from your module; it > may n > ot be inheriting a required module or a module may not be adding its source > path > entries properly > > > To reproduce: > > public class Test implements EntryPoint { > static class Parametric<T> { > enum Numbers { > ONE, TWO; > } > } > > public void onModuleLoad() { > switch (Parametric.Numbers.valueOf("ONE")) { > case ONE: // Line 14 > System.out.println("ONE"); > break; > case TWO: // Line 17 > System.out.println("ONE"); > break; > } > } > } > > Removing the parameter from the type enclosing the enum fixes the problem. > > The above *works* in trunk and 1.6, but I searched a little bit and I > couldn't find anything in the issue tracker that appeared related. > Upgrading to 1.6/trunk isn't a good option for me at the moment, so > I'm hoping that someone has seen this before and could help me find > the change that fixed it. If it's a simple patch, I can apply it to > 1.5.3 until such time as an upgrade is possible. Moving the enum to a > non-parameterized type would probably work as well, but I'm loathe to > do too much redesign on account of a compiler bug that appears to > already have been fixed. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---