In terms of the GWT 1.5 code line, we're very unlikely to actually release a
1.5.4...GWT 1.6 is just around the corner.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Scott Blum <sco...@google.com> wrote:
> Isaac, I would put money on our updating to a newer version of JDT. I'd
> find where Lex committed this upgrade... if there are no code changes, you
> might try putting the newer JDT higher on the classpath as a test. If that
> works, simple jar surgery should get you where you want to go.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Isaac Truett <itru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I've found an interesting error in GWT 1.5.3:
>>
>> [ERROR] Line 14: Type mismatch: cannot convert from
>> Test.Parametric.Number
>> s to Test.Parametric<T>.Numbers
>> [ERROR] Line 17: Type mismatch: cannot convert from
>> Test.Parametric.Number
>> s to Test.Parametric<T>.Numbers
>> Compiling module test.Test
>> Computing all possible rebind results for 'test.client.Test'
>> Rebinding test.client.Test
>> Checking rule <generate-with
>> class='com.google.gwt.user.rebind.ui.ImageBun
>> dleGenerator'/>
>> [ERROR] Unable to find type 'test.client.Test'
>> [ERROR] Hint: Previous compiler errors may have made this type
>> unava
>> ilable
>> [ERROR] Hint: Check the inheritance chain from your module; it
>> may n
>> ot be inheriting a required module or a module may not be adding its
>> source path
>> entries properly
>>
>>
>> To reproduce:
>>
>> public class Test implements EntryPoint {
>> static class Parametric<T> {
>> enum Numbers {
>> ONE, TWO;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> public void onModuleLoad() {
>> switch (Parametric.Numbers.valueOf("ONE")) {
>> case ONE: // Line 14
>> System.out.println("ONE");
>> break;
>> case TWO: // Line 17
>> System.out.println("ONE");
>> break;
>> }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> Removing the parameter from the type enclosing the enum fixes the problem.
>>
>> The above *works* in trunk and 1.6, but I searched a little bit and I
>> couldn't find anything in the issue tracker that appeared related.
>> Upgrading to 1.6/trunk isn't a good option for me at the moment, so
>> I'm hoping that someone has seen this before and could help me find
>> the change that fixed it. If it's a simple patch, I can apply it to
>> 1.5.3 until such time as an upgrade is possible. Moving the enum to a
>> non-parameterized type would probably work as well, but I'm loathe to
>> do too much redesign on account of a compiler bug that appears to
>> already have been fixed.
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
