Hi,
I am also using OOPHM from past one month. I see lot of productivity
improvement by that. But I am scared when I will move GWT 1.6 then I have to
again go back to the Hosted Mode browser. Can't we have very basic
functionality available for GWT 1.6. Let it be in trunk so that people
interested may build it themselve depending upon their need. But definately
I can't wait for one more quarter for OOPHM.
Is GWT 1.6 release is due on Google IO?
Regards,
Allahbaksh

On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Sami Jaber <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think it could really (really) be interesting to get OOPHM with 1.6, is
> it so much work John (why not using a generator for the overlay classes,
> Sanjiv seems to use this kind of tool for SmartGWT) ?
>
> I was using OOPHM as a early adopter since the beginning and with the
> incompatibilities between OOPHM and the new war directory layout, there is
> no way to provide you for feedback and I have lost in term of productivity
> (compile time is still so slow in 1.6)
>
> btw, runAsync was slated for the release after 1.6 and it is still in the
> trunk for a while now, does it mean that the scope is being changed ?
>
>
> Sami
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:54 AM, John Tamplin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Vitali Lovich <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Darn.  Would there be any branch that does work?
>>
>>
>> Do you mean a branch of 1.6?  No, as it would be too much work to maintain
>> it.  OOPHM has always been slated for the release after 1.6, and it
>> currently exists as an overlay of particular classes in gwt-dev, so when
>> those classes are changed corresponding changes have to be made to the
>> overlay classes.
>>
>> Eventually, OOPHM will replace legacy hosted mode entirely in trunk, and
>> we can have a single gwt-dev.jar with no native code (branches/oophm is
>> already setup that way).
>>
>>
>> --
>> John A. Tamplin
>> Software Engineer (GWT), Google
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to