Wait - I'm confused. I am running with trunk & I've been unable to get OOPHM working. Thanks.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:50 AM, John Tamplin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Allahbaksh Asadullah < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I am also using OOPHM from past one month. I see lot of productivity >> improvement by that. But I am scared when I will move GWT 1.6 then I have to >> again go back to the Hosted Mode browser. Can't we have very basic >> functionality available for GWT 1.6. Let it be in trunk so that people >> interested may build it themselve depending upon their need. But definately >> I can't wait for one more quarter for OOPHM. > > > I'm sorry but it would be too much work to try and port it back and then > maintain two separate branches of OOPHM. It is already enough of a hassle > when we merge from 1.6->trunk, making corresponding changes to OOPHM. > > The answer is if you need OOPHM, you are going to need to be running > trunk. I realize it is not ready for production use yet, but you can still > do debugging with trunk and do production compiles with 1.6 if necessary. > > >> Is GWT 1.6 release is due on Google IO? >> > > I'm not the one to comment on release schedules, but you have seen the > announcements about the milestones and that the next public build will be a > release candidate, so we are getting close. > > > -- > John A. Tamplin > Software Engineer (GWT), Google > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
