Isn't that achieved by the auxiliary warnings? Or do you mean you want them all listed in the one error message, or am I misunderstandinging the scenario you describe?
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Lex Spoon <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks! > > The overall report layout is a big improvement. We are going to see > fewer messages where all we can do is decode the messages for people. > > I like the three message levels. Cool. > > Looking at the report, I still have a slight preference for listing > out the subtypes that were tried if there's a "no serializable > subtypes" error. It's not a big deal, because the user can do F4 in > their IDE, but it seems a little easier on them. It also provides > another cross-check for them for whenever they think GWT made the > wrong decision. > > > > Lex > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
