Also, don't we need a version on emma_ant.jar? There should have been one put on emma.jar, but it looks like an oversight.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Scott Blum <[email protected]> wrote: > Why does emma live in redist/ instead of /lib anyway? > > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:47 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Reviewers: bruce, >> >> Description: >> This patch adds the emma_ant jar to our tools directory so the GWT build >> file can use it to generate code coverage data. We already include >> emma.jar. >> >> A subsequent patch to trunk will update the build files to add code >> coverage stats. >> >> Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/51812 >> >> Affected files: >> redist/emma/README.txt >> redist/emma/emma_ant.jar >> >> >> Index: redist/emma/README.txt >> =================================================================== >> --- redist/emma/README.txt (revision 5777) >> +++ redist/emma/README.txt (working copy) >> @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ >> >> emma.jar: the jar file produced by the patched emma. >> >> +emma_ant.jar: the jar file containing custom EMMA ant tasks that can be >> +downloaded from sourceforge.net. >> + >> com.mountainminds.eclemma.core_1.3.2.jar : eclemma jar containing the >> updated >> emma.jar >> >> Index: redist/emma/emma_ant.jar >> =================================================================== >> Cannot display: file marked as a binary type. >> svn:mime-type = application/octet-stream >> >> Property changes on: redist/emma/emma_ant.jar >> ___________________________________________________________________ >> Name: svn:mime-type >> + application/octet-stream >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
