Web mode stack traces are steadily improving. You can even get line numbers
(by inheriting com.google.gwt.core.EmulateJsStack).
Without the extra instrumentation you web mode stack traces might look
something like this:
at Unknown.$NullPointerException()
at Unknown.onClick_6()
at Unknown.dispatch()
at Unknown.$fireEvent()
at Unknown.$fireEvent_0()
at Unknown.$fireEvent_1()
at Unknown.fireNativeEvent()
at Unknown.onBrowserEvent()
at Unknown.dispatchEventImpl()
at Unknown.dispatchEventAndCatch()
at Unknown.anonymous()
I was thinking it might make slightly more sense if we replaced 'Unknown'
with 'JavaScript', e.g.
at JavaScript.$NullPointerException()
at JavaScript.onClick_6()
at JavaScript.dispatch()
at JavaScript.$fireEvent()
at JavaScript.$fireEvent_0()
at JavaScript.$fireEvent_1()
at JavaScript.fireNativeEvent()
at JavaScript.onBrowserEvent()
at JavaScript.dispatchEventImpl()
at JavaScript.dispatchEventAndCatch()
at JavaScript.anonymous()
Anyone have strong opinions wither way?
--
Fred Sauer
Developer Advocate
Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
[email protected]
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
