On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Scott Blum <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Bruce Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Senator Blum, >> >> Do you mean "disturbing" as in >> 1) revolting, >> 2) distressing, or >> 3) disordering? >> > > Distressing, I think. > > -- Example #1 -- > > Please sort the following two lists chronlogically as quickly as you can: > > List 1: "1.6.2", "1.6.5", "1.6.0", "1.6.1" > > List 2: "2.0.0-rc2", "2.0.0-ms2", "2.0.0", "2.0.0-rc1" > The flipside of this argument, is identify the release versions in each list. -- Example #2 -- > > uberuser: There's a bug in GWT where tab panels explode on FF3. > > gwtcoder: What version are you using? I fixed that in 2.0.0. > (+Status:Duplicate) > > uberuser: I'm using 2.0.0 and it's still broken. > > gwtcoder: Okay I'll take a look (-Status:Duplicate, +Status:Accepted) > > gwtcoder: I can't repro this in 2.0.0. Are you sure you're using the 2.0.0 > RELEASE and not 2.0.0-rc1 or 2.0.0-ms2? (-Status:Accepted, > +Status:NeedsInfo) > > uberuser: Doh! You're right, I was using 2.0.0-rc1. After upgrading to > 2.0.0 RELEASE and recompiling, the problem went away. Sorry, thanks! > > gwtcoder: No prob, our version numbers are admittedly a bit confusing. > (-Status:NeedsInfo, +Status:Duplicate) > I agree that has the potential to be a problem, but I would expect such a user to report the full version number rather than truncating it. Also, I would expect them to try and upgrade to the released version before reporting a problem (especially since we nag them every time once it is released). -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
