On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Cameron Braid <came...@braid.com.au> wrote:
> JBoss use a naming scheme that sorts alphabetically, maybe it is worth > considering > > http://www.jboss.org/jbossas/downloads/ > > Applied to the names in the original email > > 1) gwt-2.0.0-m1.zip > 2) gwt-2.0.0-m2.zip > 3) gwt-2.0.0-rc1.zip > 4) gwt-2.0.0.zip > > They could be : > > 1) gwt-2.0.0-Beta1.zip (or could just use B1) > 2) gwt-2.0.0-Beta2.zip > 3) gwt-2.0.0-CR1.zip (candidate for release) > 4) gwt-2.0.0-GA.zip > That still doesn't get you out of knowing the naming scheme in your sorter -- Beta10 would be ordered before Beta2 if you don't do something special. However, I think the only case where it will actually need to be sorted is in code, and we can encode the proper behavior there, so I don't this is an important consideration and we should just go with what is the clearest. -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
