On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Freeland Abbott <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's a drag... I hadn't noticed any instances where the main log and > child were interleaved (do we bother to differentiate which parallel child > logs are being used, in such a case?? I'm not positive what you are asking, but the UI doesn't show anything special, other than more things will appear in the branches -- I think they only get revealed if for example you show an ERROR log level in an INFO branch, etc. > OOPHM clearly has multiple loggers going, but it had seemed that within > each we had fairly clean separation). And the idea had been to avoid > needing to add "task completed" messages, or knowing which tasks were > interesting)... or having to do time-differential math, although that is at > least possible. Hm. > What happens is that some code generates a branch to log a particular type of things in and goes about its business, and that branch gets passed into other code. More things get logged to the main logger, including normal branches. You can run Showcase in OOPHM with sufficient log level to get a lot of stuff and just look at the timestamps. The fact that the order of the events doesn't match the order in the fully-expanded logger was in fact why I added the timestamps in the first place. -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
