On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Bruce Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Related future discussion: I'm not really a fan of > <set-configuration-property> and would love to see it go away since in > principle it unifies with <set-property> (doesn't it?) All this stuff it > getting too fragmented and confusing. > The fundamental difference is that a config property may: - have values which are not valid Java identifiers - have values not known ahead of time, such as a filename - have multiple values - do not impact the set of permutations compiled What did you have in mind to unify that with deferred binding properties? -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
