Let's take this to a separate thread or a wave, just to keep things organized.
2009/12/22 John Tamplin <[email protected]> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Bruce Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Related future discussion: I'm not really a fan of >> <set-configuration-property> and would love to see it go away since in >> principle it unifies with <set-property> (doesn't it?) All this stuff it >> getting too fragmented and confusing. >> > > The fundamental difference is that a config property may: > > - have values which are not valid Java identifiers > - have values not known ahead of time, such as a filename > - have multiple values > - do not impact the set of permutations compiled > > What did you have in mind to unify that with deferred binding properties? > > -- > John A. Tamplin > Software Engineer (GWT), Google > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
