See: http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_thread/thread/4f5fb0cbd007fa25/e6a70c6a26a444cd?lnk=gst&q=compatibility+animations#e6a70c6a26a444cd
On 1 Feb., 17:23, dflorey <[email protected]> wrote: > What about Fred Sauer's gwt voices project? > AFAK it has an elegant approach how to provide flash based fallback if > certain capabilities are not supported by the browser itself. > > On 1 Feb., 14:25, Joel Webber <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > To be clear, we do recognize the importance of starting to support HTML5 > > constructs that don't work on all browsers, though we need to find a clear > > way to indicate to developers that a particular library or widget won't work > > in some cases. None of us have ever worked through all the nuances of how > > this should be done yet, and probably won't have time to do so until at > > least Q2. That said, if you want to start the discussion, I'm all ears! > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Ray Ryan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As you'll see in the first note in this thread, Incubator is closing down. > > > > Having your work in its own project is exactly the right thing to do. If > > > it > > > becomes an appropriate addition for GWT proper, we'll eagerly help you > > > integrate it. In the meantime, the community can use it and shape it > > > without > > > waiting for the GWT team to get in the mix. > > > > rjrjr > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Mark Renouf <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> I've developed "gwt-html5-media", which implements all the common > > >> functionality described in the "Media Element" section of the HTML5 > > >> spec, including the specific functionality for Video and Audio tags, > > >> including all of the events and settings. I could use some help > > >> testing and improving it and perhaps some advice on how to better > > >> handle usage of the large number of new native events available > > >> (currently side-steps the main GWT sinkEvents code instead using it's > > >> own, since it exhausts the available number of free bitfield > > >> definitions there). > > > >>http://code.google.com/p/gwt-html5-media/ > > > >> Would something like this be welcome in incubator or simply as a side > > >> project for eventual inclusion into GWT? I'd like to see the HTML5 > > >> support rounded out so this plus the Canvas support would me a major > > >> step forward. I know there is also another pure-canvas implementation > > >> for GWT within the SpeedTracer project. I'm not sure if VML fallback > > >> is worth the complexity if the only browser supporting it does not > > >> support any other HTML5 features anyhow... but that's a point for > > >> debate elsewhere I suppose ;-) > > > >> On Jan 12, 1:04 pm, John LaBanca <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Incubator Users - > > > >> > The Google Web Toolkit Incubator project began as a proving grounds for > > >> new > > >> > widgets to be vetted before joining the ranks of the GWT trunk. We've > > >> seen > > >> > some success stories over the last year with EventHandlers, > > >> ClientBundle, > > >> > and DatePicker, but for many of the widgets and libraries, Incubator > > >> > has > > >> > become an elephant graveyard. > > > >> > In order to address this issue, we will start graduating some of the > > >> > libraries to GWT trunk, move some into separate projects, and > > >> discontinue > > >> > development on others. Ultimately, we will wind down the incubator > > >> project > > >> > completely. > > > >> > The schedule below shows the fate of each subproject in incubator. It's > > >> a > > >> > tentative schedule, meaning that it could change as priorities shift. > > > >> > GWT 2.1 > > > >> > - *PagingScrollTable and FastTree* > > >> > We are working on a new set of data backed widgets for GWT 2.1 that > > >> will > > >> > include APIs for trees and tables. We will build upon the lessons > > >> learned > > >> > with these incubator widgets, but the API for the new data backed > > >> widgets > > >> > will evolve significantly from the current APIs. When the data > > >> > backed > > >> > widgets are added to GWT trunk, we will stop development on > > >> > the PagingScrollTable and FastTree. > > > >> > - *Locale Selection* > > >> > Selecting the locale on the server requires one less round trip to > > >> the > > >> > server on startup and is needed for effective use of > > >> > runtime locales selection. This library will be included in GWT > > >> > 2.1. > > > >> > GWT 2.2 > > > >> > - *CollapsiblePanel* > > >> > This widget will probably become a subclass of DockingLayoutPanel, > > >> > similar to SplitLayoutPanel. > > > >> > - *SliderBar and ProgressBar* > > >> > Both of these widgets currently require the use of a global timer, > > >> which > > >> > has performance implications. If we can implement these without a > > >> resize > > >> > timer, we will include them in GWT 2.2. If we cannot, we will > > >> discontinue > > >> > development on them. > > > >> > - *Logging* > > >> > The logging API may make it into GWT 2.1 if time permits. > > > >> > - *Form Validation* > > >> > We will take a closer look at the form validation API in GWT 2.2.. > > > >> > Separate Project: > > > >> > - *SoundResource* > > >> > SoundResource is a promising API for including sound in an > > >> application, > > >> > but it makes sense to wait for HTML 5 features to become widely > > >> adopted > > >> > before including it. We would like to move SoundResource into the > > >> gwt-voices > > >> > project:http://code.google.com/p/gwt-voices/. > > > >> > - *Graphics* > > >> > The graphics library provides a single, platform independent API > > >> > that > > >> > works on top of Canvas and VML. The library is not ready for GWT > > >> trunk, but > > >> > this project is worth pursuing. > > > >> > - *HtmlDecorators* > > >> > We will continue to work on this project to arbitrarily add > > >> decorations > > >> > to widgets. > > > >> > As always, please feel free to reply with comments or suggestions. > > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > John LaBanca > > >> > on behalf of the GWT team > > > >> -- > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > > > > -- > > > I wish this were a Wave > > > > -- > > >http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
