There is a lot of copying going here which is bad. Would this be better done by adding just the new classes to the DynaTable sample, and having another gwt.xml in the DynaTable sample. The two gwt.xml could then pull just the subset of files they require.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/710801/diff/4001/5008 File samples/dynatablerf/src/com/google/gwt/sample/dynatablerf/DynaTableRf.gwt.xml (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/710801/diff/4001/5008#newcode20 samples/dynatablerf/src/com/google/gwt/sample/dynatablerf/DynaTableRf.gwt.xml:20: <inherits name='com.google.gwt.rpc.RPC' /> Why does DynaTableRf still need RPC? http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/710801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
