Is there any specific reason for AbstractRecordEditActivity having some kind of id in its constructor?
I'm asking because we're very heavy Gin users and Gin 1 doesn't support assisted injections. The gin trunk does, but even then, I still find it annoying to provide this variable in the constructor considering the record, or id, isn't of any value to the activity until that activity is started. The only thing I can think of is that this is all Roo based now so Gin isn't part of the solution but auto-generated Roo files are. I know this new proxy place stuff carries around a record which is interesting but I still don't quite understand how to make all scenarios that we need work with that place class. -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
