On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Patrick Julien <[email protected]> wrote: > thank you for the clarification, I get it
I'm adding a new adapter class to handle this case, since optional fields seems like a common thing to see and implementing it manually requires a lot of boilerplate. > I don't suppose you have advice for using a mutable CellTable in the > editor framework? Does the HasDataEditor adapter work for you? -- Bob Vawter Google Web Toolkit Team -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
