Exactly, this is where I ran into this. On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Thomas Broyer <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 8, 2010 9:16:16 PM UTC+1, PhilBeaudoin wrote: >> >> Just ran into an interesting little hack today. Basically, the interface >> includes a method: >> >> public void __do_not_implement_this_interface_extend_FooImpl_instead(); >> >> I'm far from convinced I like it, but it sure is right in your face in >> case you don't read javadocs! ;) > > interestingly, that's exactly what Hamcrest (used in many testing tools: > JUnit, Mockito, etc.) does: > http://code.google.com/p/hamcrest/source/browse/trunk/hamcrest-java/hamcrest-core/src/main/java/org/hamcrest/Matcher.java?r=645 > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
