LGTM

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/4
File plugins/xpcom/FFSessionHandler.h (left):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/4#oldcode71
plugins/xpcom/FFSessionHandler.h:71: inline Debug::DebugStream&
operator<<(Debug::DebugStream& dbg, JSString* str) {
Why remove this?

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/5
File plugins/xpcom/JavaObject.cpp (right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/5#newcode115
plugins/xpcom/JavaObject.cpp:115: if (!JS_DefineFunction(ctx, obj,
"toString", JavaObject::toString20, 0, 0)) {
Since we don't ever need both definitions in one executable, would it be
better to put the #ifdef around the definition of toString/call and just
have the one version there?

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/7
File plugins/xpcom/Makefile (right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/7#newcode48
plugins/xpcom/Makefile:48:
Extra blank line

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/12
File plugins/xpcom/install-template.rdf (right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/12#newcode14
plugins/xpcom/install-template.rdf:14: <!-- TODO: can we add 1.5-2.0
back?  Do we care? -->
I think we can remove this line now.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/show

--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to