Some comments of my own to kick off the discussion.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1375802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/DevModeBase.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/DevModeBase.java (right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1375802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/DevModeBase.java#newcode1061
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/DevModeBase.java:1061: "Initializing
CompilationUnit cache."));
This message is mainly there to confirm that the -XpersistentUnitCache
flag is doing something.  The long term intention is just for this to be
a behind the scenes mechanism. Maybe I should TODO remove it once it
becomes the default.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1375802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateBuilder.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateBuilder.java
(left):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1375802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateBuilder.java#oldcode193
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateBuilder.java:193:
Map<CompiledClass, CompiledClass> cachedStructurallySame =
This mapping for tracking whether the non-private API of a class is
changed is replaced by just computing a hash signature with
BytecodeSignatureMaker inside of Dependencies.java

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1375802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateBuilder.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateBuilder.java
(right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1375802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateBuilder.java#newcode232
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateBuilder.java:232:
logger.log(TreeLogger.TRACE, "Invalid units found: " +
invalidatedUnits.size());
We always get this message and a small number of units that have to go
through and be re-built.  Saved units have some dependencies with
non-null values (the classes have been successfully compiled), but the
dependencies that come out of the first build have some null
dependencies.  I think its because some sources that get remapped with
rename-to or generate-with have yet to be added to the list of units
passed to the compiler when we do the initial type oracle build.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1375802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/Dependencies.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/Dependencies.java (right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1375802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/Dependencies.java#newcode171
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/Dependencies.java:171: continue;
Remove me: This was a failed experiment to get rid of invalid units.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1375802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCache.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCache.java
(right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1375802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCache.java#newcode72
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCache.java:72: *
directory with a traditional place for compiled output.
If we are happy with the dirs I've chosen, I should add purging the
compiled dir to our webappcreator's build.xml  clean target and the GWT
ant config as well.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1375802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCache.java#newcode239
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCache.java:239:
private static final String CACHE_PREFIX = "cache-";
too general purpose of a name for these files?

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1375802/diff/1/dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateTest.java
File dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateTest.java
(right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1375802/diff/1/dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateTest.java#newcode565
dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateTest.java:565: //
Refs should be converted into a compact serializable form
This is the only change to this file. I'll back out the formatting
change.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1375802/

--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to