http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1369809/diff/4001/user/src/com/google/gwt/event/dom/DomEvent.gwt.xml
File user/src/com/google/gwt/event/dom/DomEvent.gwt.xml (right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1369809/diff/4001/user/src/com/google/gwt/event/dom/DomEvent.gwt.xml#newcode3
user/src/com/google/gwt/event/dom/DomEvent.gwt.xml:3: <inherits
name="com.google.gwt.dom.DOM" />
On 2011/03/14 18:09:14, pdr wrote:
Can you alphabetize these?

Done.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1369809/diff/4001/user/src/com/google/gwt/event/dom/client/TouchEvent.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/event/dom/client/TouchEvent.java (right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1369809/diff/4001/user/src/com/google/gwt/event/dom/client/TouchEvent.java#newcode35
user/src/com/google/gwt/event/dom/client/TouchEvent.java:35: private
static class TouchSupportDetector {
This would return true for a tablet Android device.  TouchScroller has
the second check for Android, as you described.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1369809/diff/4001/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/tools/templates/eclipse/_moduleShortName_.launch
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/user/tools/templates/eclipse/_moduleShortName_.launch
(left):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1369809/diff/4001/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/tools/templates/eclipse/_moduleShortName_.launch#oldcode1
user/src/com/google/gwt/user/tools/templates/eclipse/_moduleShortName_.launch:1:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
On 2011/03/14 18:09:14, pdr wrote:
Was deleting this a mistake?

Yes, reverting

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1369809/diff/4001/user/test/com/google/gwt/touch/client/TouchScrollTest.java
File user/test/com/google/gwt/touch/client/TouchScrollTest.java (right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1369809/diff/4001/user/test/com/google/gwt/touch/client/TouchScrollTest.java#newcode513
user/test/com/google/gwt/touch/client/TouchScrollTest.java:513: }
isTouchSupported() was a helper method to determine if TouchScroller
should be supported in this test. However, now that the detection is
more complicated, copying TouchScroller.isSupport() seems redundant. I
agree in principle that it would be nice to verify that
TouchScroller.isSupported() returns the correct value on the correct
device, but if we just copy the implementation of
TouchScroller.isSupported(), then it isn't really testing anything.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1369809/

--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to