+1 for this!

Are there similar plans for com.google.gwt.i18n?
Also com.google.gwt.event could be useful in non GWT projects.
Regards.

- Andrés

On 25 mar, 18:19, Ray Ryan <[email protected]> wrote:
>    RequestFactory is proving itself useful in non-GWT contexts, so we would
>    like to give it more independence. Our plan with the GWT 2.3 release is to
>    copy com.google.gwt.requestfactory to com.google.requestfactory, and
>    deprecate everything in the old location. We will also provide a jar that
>    includes the pure JRE version of request factory with no other GWT
>    dependencies. (This change will probably not make the first 2.3 milestone
>    release.)
>
>    With 2.4, we'll delete the code in the old location. This is faster than
>    usual promise of keeping deprecated code in place for two releases, but we
>    really don't want to leave so much redundant code around any longer than we
>    have to.
>
>    The API will not change; client code should be able to migrate by simply
>    by changing import statements.
>
>    Reactions?
>
>    rjrjr

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to