We want to be able to experiment with non-GWT clients of web services, particularly via RequestFactory. But I have to put emphasis on the word "experiment." Non-GWT won't be a supported path soon, if ever.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Andrés Testi <[email protected]>wrote: > Why bindery package is nested in a web package? Are these APIs not > available for non web applications? > Regards. > > - Andrés > > On 31 mar, 01:19, [email protected] wrote: > > Ready for review. John, can you keep me honest on the treatment of > > com.google.gwt.event.shared, and the choices made in the new event > > package? > > > > Bob, does this fit what you have in mind for the bindery organization? > > > > Note that I've updated Activity and Place to use the new classes, but > > not RequestFactory. I won't submit this until Dan has his big patch in > > place, and I'll make the RF changes before I do. > > > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1394803/ > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
