Can you summarize the implementation differences? On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Chris Ruffalo <[email protected]> wrote: > We've been over this before, I think, and several problems have gotten in > the way. It's not that we don't want to cooperate, we do, but I think that > it's too divergent from the way that GWT works and wants things to work. > > I also know it doesn't really conform to GWT's code style. > > The goal, initially, was for gwt-validation to be included in gwt as the > default. I don't know that GWT needs it's own fully-compliant JSR-303 > framework. Plus gwt-validation is only around 55% compliant anyway at r328. > > But know that the gwt-validation project leadership (i.e. me) has no problem > with this. > > v/r > > Chris Ruffalo, gwt-validation project lead > > > On Saturday, April 7, 2012 2:21:51 AM UTC-4, Gilberto Pacheco Gallegos > wrote: >> >> There is another project that seems to be more advanced than current >> status: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-validation/ ¿Is there a chance to >> include it's work? > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
