Absolutely, 1)
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:15:07 PM UTC-4, Ray Cromwell wrote: > > Can you summarize the implementation differences? > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Chris Ruffalo <[email protected]> > wrote: > > We've been over this before, I think, and several problems have gotten in > > the way. It's not that we don't want to cooperate, we do, but I think > that > > it's too divergent from the way that GWT works and wants things to work. > > > > I also know it doesn't really conform to GWT's code style. > > > > The goal, initially, was for gwt-validation to be included in gwt as the > > default. I don't know that GWT needs it's own fully-compliant JSR-303 > > framework. Plus gwt-validation is only around 55% compliant anyway at > r328. > > > > But know that the gwt-validation project leadership (i.e. me) has no > problem > > with this. > > > > v/r > > > > Chris Ruffalo, gwt-validation project lead > > > > > > On Saturday, April 7, 2012 2:21:51 AM UTC-4, Gilberto Pacheco Gallegos > > wrote: > >> > >> There is another project that seems to be more advanced than current > >> status: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-validation/ ¿Is there a chance to > >> include it's work? > > > > -- > > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
