Hey Stephen, Thanks for the info. So we should probably try and land it. From my quick summary of the comment thread, it looks like there's disagreement on the implementation. Can you or John save me some time and fill me in on the history?
Rajeev On Fri May 04 14:24:11 GMT-400 2012, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If it's important enough, we should land it, but my impression is that > it isn't > > It is the 7th-ranked bug in the issue tracker (by number of stars). But, > as John said, it's had 5 years to get all those votes. > > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1380807/<https://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1380807/> > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
