https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1727808/diff/8001/build.xml File build.xml (right):
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1727808/diff/8001/build.xml#newcode41 build.xml:41: <call-subproject subproject="elemental" subtarget="build" /> I asked Ray about this. Elemental is experimental and its build process is rather interesting (and probably not very portable), so maybe we shouldn't build it by default? We should still include the jar in a binary distribution, though. What's the best way to handle that in ant? https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1727808/diff/8001/build.xml#newcode131 build.xml:131: <call-subproject subproject="elemental" subtarget="checkstyle" /> I think this is okay so long as we only check style on the manually-written code. We can do that without running the generator. https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1727808/diff/8001/build.xml#newcode144 build.xml:144: <call-subproject subproject="elemental" subtarget="test" /> Let's defer this until after we've moved the tests to open source. https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1727808/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
