On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Thomas Broyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is what the c.g.g.util is for AFAICT, with c.g.g.util.tools.shared > being for things usable "on server-side" (included in gwt-servlet); and as > a rule of thumb any class not listed in the javadocs we generate should be > considered "private". > I disagree with that -- I think unless the package includes "impl" or the name or Javadoc clearly indicates it is an implementation class, any public class should be considered public. -- John A. Tamplin -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
