Hi Brian: This is well-documented and looks like solid work. >
Thanks for the kudos! > I think the main issue will be whether it can be made compatible with > modular compilation. So the best timing will be to land it after modular > compilation. > > It looks like it should be compatible because the compiler doesn't need to > see how a @Rebind method is implemented in order to call the generator for > a call site? So we can run the generator in each module that calls a > @Rebind-marked interface method. > I was very careful when merged John changes. In fact, these where the only merge conflicts I remember during the prototype development. UnifiyAst, JProgram and GwtAstBuilder where our mainly conflicted classes, but he only added constant renamings and support for a new kind of visitor in these files. I think it should not be an issue, since my changes are only AST transformations. I must to elaborate the "Implementation Details" section to clear doubts. Thanks for read and annotate the proposal! - Andrés Testi -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
