Stephen: Per Brian's comments, a javax.rebinding spec might have a hard time > having feature-parity with GWT, because I imagine the Java8 plugins, > like APT, only runs on .java files currently under compile, and doesn't > re-process all of the types in .class files via .jars on the classpath.
I think so. As I know, Java 8 plugins are applied at the AST transformation level. > Which, AFAIK, is what John is getting to work--that a .jar (or .gwtlib) > is basically compiled, but can have one more global rebinding pass that > modifies its contents before GWT writes everything to disk. > Nice! I would like to know more details about what John is doing. Well, you mentioned "jribble", so now I'm a fan of basically anything > you say. :-) I'm aware of your involvement on Scala-GWT, and regret that the project is stopped. Let me know if I can help you and the others to reanimate it! - Andrés Testi -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
